| DC Field | Value | Language |
| dc.contributor.author | Cleophas, Ton J. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-04-21T05:45:55Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-04-21T05:45:55Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-319-15195-3 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/201 | - |
| dc.description | This book will demonstrate that machine learning performs sometimes better
than traditional statistics does. For example, if the data perfectly fi t the cut-offs
for node splitting, because, e.g., ages > 55 years give an exponential rise in
infarctions, then decision trees, optimal binning, and optimal scaling will be better
analysis- methods than traditional regression methods with age as continuous
predictor. Machine learning may have little options for adjusting confounding and
interaction, but you can add propensity scores and interaction variables to almost
any machine learning method.
Each chapter will start with purposes and scientifi c questions. Then, step-by-step
analyses, using both real data and simulated data examples, will be given. Finally, a
paragraph with conclusion, and references to the corresponding sites of three intro-
ductory textbooks previously written by the same authors, is given | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The amount of data stored in the world’s databases doubles every 20 months, as
estimated by Usama Fayyad, one of the founders of machine learning and co-author
of the book Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ed. by the
American Association for Artifi cial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1996), and
clinicians, familiar with traditional statistical methods, are at a loss to analyze them.
Traditional methods have, indeed, diffi culty to identify outliers in large datasets,
and to fi nd patterns in big data and data with multiple exposure/outcome variables.
In addition, analysis-rules for surveys and questionnaires, which are currently com-
mon methods of data collection, are, essentially, missing. Fortunately, the new dis-
cipline, machine learning, is able to cover all of these limitations.
So far, medical professionals have been rather reluctant to use machine learning.
Ravinda Khattree, co-author of the book Computational Methods in Biomedical
Research (ed. by Chapman & Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 2007) suggests that
there may be historical reasons: technological (doctors are better than computers
(?)), legal, cultural (doctors are better trusted). Also, in the fi eld of diagnosis mak-
ing, few doctors may want a computer checking them, are interested in collabora-
tion with a computer or with computer engineers. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
| dc.subject | Medicine | en_US |
| dc.subject | Machine | en_US |
| dc.title | Machine Learning in Medicine - a Complete Overview | en_US |
| dc.type | Book | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | ARTS & SCIENCE
|